If you haven’t read our Trayvon Martin pre-verdict opinion, here it is.

Check back because it will be updated when tips come in with names & pictures to publish. Look below for the descriptions & listen to the voices of these jurors & identify them for a researcher’s fee: info@NewsBall.com

Well we thought we had an explosive picture to start this article……..

Like our discovery of the only Holly Lahti Lottery Winner picture which we sold to NY Post, Good Day LA, & others, & our comprehensive Skylar Neese Murder coverage which got mentioned at The Examiner & RadarOnline, we thought we had worked our magic again & dug up an obscure image of the 6 woman jury of the George Zimmerman murder case through a thumbnail on a youtube video from a month ago which had been edited from 3 images seemingly from a jury pool:

George Zimmerman Trayvon Martin jury jurors 6 female six females who are the jurors zimmerman trayvon case trial not guilty book deal dropped
Click me for the truth

We were ready to publish it, but what a let down – it was a false lead! After running the image through Google Image database, we saw the true original image was from a BBC show called “The Verdict”! Someone took time editing out the males from 3 images to make that 6 female juror image just for one of their obscure youtube pretrial ZImmerman videos. Since he had access to raw videos, it seems like the image could be legit, but alas – no.

Now on to business.

$1,000 reward for the names & images of the 6 jurors described below.

We are still asking the public’s help in identifying the names & visuals of the 6 females on the George Zimmerman jury. We are offering a reward, but make no mistake – this is not the days of the wild west – it is NOT a bounty. Because some idiots will take “reward” & run with it, let’s call it a researcher’s fee like we have received many times in the mass media coming to us to buy photos we dug up. We wish no harm on the jurors, we are making no threats towards the jurors, & we do not encourage anything of the sort. We want to publish their names in enforcing our policy to bring you uncensored news where ANYONE affecting ANYONE from public news stories are subject to scrutiny in the public spotlight. We have no other motive then strictly from a pure organic news principle. We bring you the aspects of the news that the mass media cannot do to liabilities & political correctness. So here is the extensive detailed information on each of the six jurors, along with their voices from their court interviews – as an aide to assist you in identifying your neighbor or acquaintances. When you have, contact us so we can publish that information as we strive to maintain our level of consistency in always revealing ANYONE affecting ANYONE.

George Zimmerman Trayvon Martin jury jurors 6 female six females who are the jurors zimmerman trayvon case trial not guilty murder let off killed


She has signed with Sharlene Martin, a literary agent to write a book about her jury duty. You can contact Sharlene at Sharlene@MartinLiteraryManagement.com

UPDATE 7/16: Sharlene Martin (ironically, no relation to Trayvon Martin) has DROPPED Juror B37’s book deal a day after her email to us.

B37 juror called Trayvon Martin “a boy of color” in the video below:
She went on CNN after signing a book deal, but that topic was off limits:

The bully in the group. She loves to talk & controlled the deliberations – even convincing the 1 minority juror B29 to change her vote from 2nd degree murder to not guilty. Juror B37, like most bullies, is not a very bright lady & its a shame we trust jurors like this to interpret laws when seeing if they can be applied to the charges on the table as she stated they wanted to convict Zimmerman of something, but they couldn’t find something on how they interpreted the law! 18 minute mark in the CNN interview above – just disgusting: “George went a little too far??? He’s learned a good lesson”!?!??

Originally from Iowa, she is not in Sanford, FL, but rather Oviedo, Winter Springs FL. She has many pets: 3 dogs, 4 cats, a parrot, a crow with one wing, two lizards & mentioned her 2 daughters as an afterthought – so her motherly instincts or care for children became suspect. She is the only juror to have had a license to carry a concealed gun. She goes to the shooting range with her husband, who has guns. He is an attorney, & together they are writing their surely captivating book about sitting in a trial for 3 weeks. This juror also says she hates the media, finds news worthless & she only used newspapers to line her parrot cages and that news is “skewed one way or the other.” Funny now that she’s publishing a book – the news is her best friend. She referred to peaceful marches demanding the arrest of Zimmerman in Sanford as “riots.”


This is the 1 minority juror. She is hispanic – like George Zimmerman. The rest are all white.

She is the ONLY one to not issue an anonymous statement yet, & was the 1 holdout that voted George Zimmerman was GUILTY of 2nd Degree Murder – until the bully & leader of the jurors (B37) beat her down to exhaustion & when she was going to hold out, walk out, & cause a hung jury – Juror B37 put the guilt on her stating ‘No your not. We have done this for too long, came this far. We are doing this‘ until finally after enough bullying, Juror B29 was convinced to vote not guilty. UPDATE 7/26/20139 Juror B29 HAS INTERVIEWED. She is 36 years old & called “Maddy” in her interview”. She says George Zimmerman got away with murder. She was bullied & guilt tripped by B37 into changing her vote from murder to not guilty. We are still asking the public for her name as we strive for uncensored, complete news that our readers expect. Do you recognize her? Send in her full name for a researcher’s fee.

She has been arrested, but said the matter was no longer pending because the charges were dropped, that she had been treated fairly, and that she wouldn’t hold the fact of her arrest against either side. (Usually those that have been arrested are pro-defense).

B29 just went on TV (7/25/13) to counter the lies told by B37:

Juror B29 is a 36 year old Hispanic nurse who works the night shift with Alzheimer’s patients. She was a resident of Chicago at the time of the shooting, having arrived in Seminole county only four months prior to the start of the trial. This relatively recent arrival to the area is part of the explanation for why she says she has “no idea” about the case. In addition, she explained, “I don’t like watching the news, period,” and “I don’t read any newspapers, don’t watch the news.” She also indicated that she didn’t tend to watch crime procedural programs, saying that she preferred the real world to “make believe.” She did, however, recall that some “little boy had passed away,” and she assumed that “he was a kid, 12 or 13.” She recalled seeing pictures of Trayvon in various formats, including T-shirts. She recalled hearing people talking talking about the event in the context of the “child who died.”

B29 has eight children, the oldest of whom is 20 and recently returned home to look for work. She as been married for 10 years. Asked if she worked with any charitable type of organizations outside her regular job she answered, “My house is my organization.” She speaks passionately about her children.


When asked if Zimmerman had done anything wrong by being a part of the Neighborhood Program, this juror replied “No, he was doing what he was supposed to be doing.”

She is retired, unmarried, and has no children, and lives with a dog and a 20-year-old cat. She has lived in Seminole county for 9 years. She works in real estate & runs a call center where she said she had experience resolving conflicts.

Strangely enough, she still managed to get on the jury despite saying she is a newspaper reader. She recalled that some people felt that Zimmerman was not arrested quickly enough, and that’s why the police chief had lost his job.


She wondered aloud why “a kid”, meaning Trayvon Martin, was out at night getting candy.           (He did in fact have skittles on him)

She has been a resident in Seminole country for almost two decades. Married for 30 years, she has two children, a 28-year-old son and a 26-year-old daughter. She and her husband once ran a construction company, but currently she is unemployed and her husband manages their several rental properties, which provide their main source of income. She spends much of her time rescuing pets in need of care.

In terms of recalling crime in her neighborhood, B76 mentioned teenagers vandalizing signs, but a call to the police seemed to resolve the matter. They had an already established Neighborhood Watch Program in her neighborhood at the time, & she recalled using it to call her neighbors about it at the time.

Although B76 described no personal experience with firearms, she did say that several close family members own guns.

On the subject of “taking the law into your own hands,” B76 adamantly discusses the Good Samaritan law. “If you see a person who needs help, you don’t necessarily just wait for the police to arrive. If I saw someone beating a child I would definitely get involved, I’d push the person down if I needed to, to protect the child.


Like Hispanic juror B29 – this juror E6 also has been arrested, but says that she was treated fairly, was deserving of it, and would not hold it against either side in this case. She explained that it had been a domestic violence matter. (Again, usually those that have been arrested are pro-defense).

She is a white mother with adolescent children, 11- and 13-years-old, and again was a jury first presented to the court on the second day of jury selection. She had lived in Seminole county since 1999.

She told the Court that her husband had several guns in the household, including a 9mm pistol and .38 caliber revolver, and a couple of rifles. Her 13-year-old son also has a hunting rifle and some BB guns. E6 has been to the range once shooting actual firearms, and has done target practice with the BB guns.


“Juror E40 looks at Trayvon’s autopsy photos with pencil to mouth…”

E40 is a white woman in her 60s who was living in Iowa at the time the shooting occurred. She had lived in Seminole county for only 7 months prior to appearing for this jury service. She works as a safety officer, a profession she has practiced for more than 25 years. She has one child, a 28-year-old son currently looking for work. She had once before, 20 years ago, served on a criminal trial jury, and had liked the experience.

She does not have guns herself, but mentioned that her brother-in-law has hunting rifles.

Well? Listen to their voices, read their descriptions. We at NewsBall.com belief news is an art form & we believe in providing the full complete uncensored story. So your contribution would be greatly appreciated as an asset to the community of people that have invested much of their time following this & it’s only fair that their curiosity is satisfied, as well as ANYONE AFFECTING ANYONE & ANYTHING ARE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC SCRUTINY & we are offering a $1,000 reward aka researcher’s fee for these juror’s names & pictures so that we may continue to provide our level of excellence in digging up the facts we want to report on. Their phone numbers/addresses are not wanted.

Trayvon Martin shirts & more on Amazon
George Zimmerman books & shirts on Amazon

Share this story

Related Articles:

CRIME SCENE PHOTOS: Have you seen Trayvon Martin’s dead body? Does it sway your opinion vs George Zimmerman?

How George Zimmerman got away with sexually molesting his cousin from age 6 until 19

EXCLUSIVE: Book deal by Juror B37 of the George Zimmerman Trial DROPPED by literary agent after pressure by NewsBall

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE – Pictures of the family that George Zimmerman “SAVED” from a burning car or was it staged?

NewsBall under attack by the masses of misinformed – even lawyers – claiming FBI, DOJ, DHS, & other authorities were going to break down our doors & arrest us.

36 Responses

  1. You’ve have to be pretty dumb to think Trayvon Martin was murdered or that Zimmerman was guilty, so not sure what this serves other than to spread degeneracy.

  2. I fail to see how Trayvon was not a child. He was 17 and we are talking about the law here. Can you legally vote or join the armed forces? No? You are a child in the eyes of the law. I know many often try minors as adults, but this is a different situation.

  3. Hey there, I hopped over to your web site via Twitter. Not some thing I generally read, however I enjoy your thoughts none the less. Thanks for developing something worthy of reading!

  4. I find it funny that “the mob” is more pissed off at this jury than the one Casey Anthony had….and she was a baby killer! But just because the guy is black (with a violent history, drugs and weapons as well) suddenly everyone is in an uproar! Caylee Anthony was an innocent child….trayvon Martin first of all was NOT a child and he definitely was not innocent by any means! If you’re gonna be pissed at any jury at least get it right!
    When will you people learn that jurors don’t know everything nancy grace makes up every night…they make the best decision based on the evidence put infront of them

  5. You people have way too much fucking time on your hands!….every heard of boundaries??? Ever heard of privacy??? How would you feel if someone had dedicated what looks like an enormous amount of effort to find you??…these are all women! Ever wonder if they have children that they’re trying to protect from people such as yourselves???


  6. From Bella: “They listened to the testimony and saw all the evidence. They were sequestered and deliberated without outside influences. They found him NOT GUILTY in spite of the state and Judge Nelson doing everything in their power to get a conviction, any conviction. This case was a travesty of justice from the very beginning for Zimmerman.”

    If you truly believed the first two sentences you wrote, then you would not have needed to justify it with your next two. The travesty belongs to the Martin’s ~ for the loss of their son ~ period.

    While I’m still undecided about the publishing of juror info, I do feel if they seek the media themselves, in whatever capacity, then they are opening themselves up for whatever onslaught ensues.

  7. There was a time when not reading the papers or watching news was a source of shame. b29, proudly admits, volunteers, that she can’t live without cable because she’ll miss her “shows” – meaning the Bravo reality shows. She says she prefers the real world to the news, that they add things to the news – as if reality shows are real.

    Don West complains that her questionnaire was difficult to read. Juror b29 says she didn’t have a desk to write on. Of course, I imagine all jurors suffered the same circumstances. Perhaps Don West is attempting to humiliate her, and her writing was perfectly legible…who knows. Why would West attempt to shame a prospective juror?

    Many of the jurors proudly proclaim they don’t watch the news or read the papers…as if this indicates smarts, or wisdom, …or something. They imply that they are “in the know”, they’ve got the “head’s up”, they’ve figured out the “secret”: NOT being informed actually makes you smarter!

    They cannot explain however, how knowing fewer things can make you smarter.

    They are a type of personality with low self-esteem. The reaction to perhaps minimal education, lack of curiosity about the world(maybe they have no time to be curious), and being not well read, is to reject our institutions of intelligence ; that is, institutions like newspapers, TV news, etc. They reject the starched and formal and well-spoken anchors as phonies. They feel inferior to academics and to professionals, professionals like lawyers; they are mistrustful of them.

    The truth is that academics and professionals make this personality type feel bad about his or herself and his or her achievements. That is the REAL reason they reject those institutions. Don West accusing b29 of producing an illegible questionnaire suggests he knows this.

    To place this personality within deliberation where she must interpret the law is a recipe for disaster. She is likely to reject the law entirely when she cannot understand it. She will say her rejection is secret intelligence – an intelligence that no one else possesses. That is what we saw and heard in the b29 ABC interview, and the b37 CNN interview: low self-esteem, rejection of institutions of intelligence, perhaps some rejection of government(another institution of intelligence), and rejection of the law of government – in the case of b29, a reliance on religious deity, also. What’s that saying from the bible?: The peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus” When you cannot understand, lean on God!

    The unanswered request for clarification on manslaughter did not help the situation either.

    b29 says she understood the law – as read to her – and made the right decision. The truth is she didn’t understand, and consequently, rejected it.

  8. There is always a monster in the community of all races However why do white men score so high in PEDOPHILIA and mass murder?


    Are white men particularly prone to carrying out the all-too-familiar mass killings of which last week’s Aurora shooting is just the latest iteration? Is there something about the white, male, middle-class experience that makes it easier for troubled young men to turn schools and movie theaters into killing fields? In a word, yes.

    Not every mass murder in recent years has been committed by a middle-class white guy. But as Jamie Utt pointed out in the hours after the Colorado theater massacre, in those rare instances where a man of color is responsible for a shooting spree (as in the 2007 Virginia Tech killings or the 2009 Fort Hood rampage), the popular reaction is to search for connections between the race or religion of the murderer and his act. After Seung-Hui Cho killed 32 people in Blacksburg, media attention focused on the likelihood that a Korean culture unwilling to acknowledge mental illness helped drive the young man to commit the worst mass murder in U.S. history. After Maj. Nidal Hasan carried out the Fort Hood shootings, his Muslim faith became all the public needed to know about his motive.

    It seems likely that Islamic extremism did lead Hasan to kill; it’s possible that Cho’s cultural background did mean that his psychological problems were particularly likely to be ignored. Ethnicity, faith, and social class are key parts of the modern human identity; they are always part of the explanation for why we think the way we think and act the way we act. The difference, as Chauncey DeVega made clear on Saturday, is that when white men commit mass murder we don’t hear how their skin color, their maleness, or their social class were contributing factors to their acts. As Peggy McIntosh famously wrote in her White Privilege Checklist, we see whites as individuals whose moral state reflects their individual will. In other words, white men kill simply because they are “sick” or “evil.” When men of color murder, it is because they are both those things and because of factors uniquely attributable to their race.

  9. Oh, and BTW, Juror B29’s lawyer is David Chico. He will definitely have info.

  10. I don’t have their names, but I do have a suggestion for finding them:

    Over the 22 day sequestration, the jurors spent their free time at the Volusia Mall , Outback Steakhouse, in Sanford, and at Amigo’s, in Altamonte Springs, as well as the Ripley’s Believe it or Not Museum. They also stayed at the Lake Mary Marriott for the 22 days.

    Reaching out to these buisinesses, as well as obtaining their CCTV footage, might aid in your investigation.
    (Please respond to my comment, NewsBall)

    Links to some articles:

  11. @Bella…

    During the period of time that the jury was supposed to be “sequestrated”, they were actually left unattended a number of time… SO, there were outside influences that could have effected the outcome of the trial… And from the interview of juror B37, she seems as if might have profited from a not guilty verdict… Therefore, benefiting her… And her husband… So, if that is the case… Out of the six… She deserves to be looked into further to see where it she was coming from when she interviewed and why she felt the need to push for a not guilty verdict… A hung jury would not have caused the end of the world… Yet, she took control of the situation and pushed for what she felt was right and got her way… Very sad… And, if money was her drive… That is not right or fair to the legal system, the Martins, or anyone that has to depend on a jury to do right when they are on trial… Money should not be a “hidden” driving factor to who is guilty or not guilty…

  12. I believe they are doing the right thing by trying to find out who these juror’s were. I think it is critical in stopping them from writing books, profiting any kind of money off this trail. B37 should be ashamed of herself. I knew once I heard their was a spouse of a lawyer on there that Zimmerman would be found not guilty. Zimmerman deserves to rot in prison. But hey he is rotting his life away in the “free” world. He will NEVER be a free man.. Looking over his shoulder every single day of his life. Do you think the parents and family of Georgie will accept Self Defense or Stand Your Ground by his murderer? I don’t think so. George is a sex offender, child killer and women beater. Point Blank Period….

  13. This is by and far one of the ugliest things that I have seen anyone do in the name of journalism. It endangers these jurors, and threatens the foundation of our judicial system. How will anyone get a fair trial when websites are posting jurors’ identities?

    Maybe you can research the names of blacks who voted for Obama so that the KKK can burn crosses on their front lawns. That would make for “uncensored news”.

    “Butterfly effect”? Bullshit. This is not starting a chain reaction that will randomly and indirectly result in a traffic accident. This would be much more direct- like pushing a toddler in traffic and blaming the driver for hitting him.

    1. You did see that Juror B29 has come forward & stated “George Zimmerman got away with murder”?

      The verdict means nothing. It is clear that Juror B37 bullied Juror B29 until she caved & changed her vote.

      We still want Juror B37’s name & picture.

      1. Newsball – you demand justice for people’s actions. If Skylar Neese’s killers Shelia Eddy blamed their actions on being lesbians and fearful of a homophobic culture, would that change things? Would we give credence to it?? I don’t think so. You claim that anyone and everyone is fair game. Why are you letting “the only minority” off the hook? BTW, how the hell is Zimmerman white, and this chick is “the only juror of color”?? You even say you’re running a story on a rape victim!!! Why are you being so ridiculous about this juror and not putting her under scrutiny?? How has she become such a victim in your eyes, when you even say that a rape victim will be scrutinized!? You lost me as a reader there with that inconsistency.

        This juror has such nerve and is purely self-promoting and self-protecting. Talking about the one juror, “The bully in the group. She loves to talk & controlled the deliberations – even convincing the 1 minority juror B29 to change her vote from 2nd degree murder to not guilty.” Right, because she held a knife to her throat?? Do you realize the legal ramifications of actually pressuring someone to vote one way or another?

        Wow…I am so sad that you took such a misguided stance. Nobody convinced that juror to vote that way- as someone who is so dedicated to her kids and so religious, she’d allow herself to be bullied into charging someone with murder?! She tried saving her butt, she wanted the limelight to come forward and say that Zimmerman got away with murder, yet SHE had the power to hang the jury.

        I’m very disappointed in such lackadaisical reporting, and I’m done with Newsball now after that story. Very disappointing.

        1. If you have this juror’s identity, please provide it & we will expose her. None of the jurors are victims – do not understand what you are saying. We wish to expose them, not protect them.

  14. I knew this cop was friends with Zimmerman. writing was on the wall! white n Hispanics stick together!

    1. Hmm, did not hear of this. We will investigate & offer a $5,000 reward for this evil monster’s capture. Soon, we can offer $100,000 for murderer’s captures.

  15. Do you not care that you will not only destroy but endanger the lives of all these women and their families — for dong what they believed to be right with the facts they were given?
    This is so completely wrong. God help you.

    1. Once again, for the third time today, we will copy/paste the same response. Go attack a lawyer next. They do their job & in the process release child molesters & killers. Rightfully so because their livelihood cannot be based on some butterfly affect. What those monsters do once let go is not the lawyers problem. Similarly, we cannot be concerned with a butterfly affect. We neither promote harm nor encourage it in any way, & no where do we ask for an address or phone number of any name & image we seek. We seek to bring our readers complete uncensored news. How about you never leave your house again, because in doing so, you will inadvertently set off a chain reaction that WILL result in someone(s) death @ some future point of time because of the placement of cars on the road, & you taking up a space, causing that person to not narrowly miss a crash they would have avoided had it not of been for you.

      That is how we view these type of ridiculous attacks against us.

      1. Yeah, just a slight differnce. You reference the release of information for child molesters and sex offenders to the public…how is what you are doing the same? Producing the pictures of these jurors is in no way providing safety to anyone. Quite the contrary, you are potentially endangering them. You can hide behind the first amendment all you want; nonetheless, what you are doing is reckless and irresponsible…very typical of the media these days, no responsibility…hey, you are just reporting the news right – regardless of the ramifications? Whatever makes you feel better I guess.

        1. We did not reference the release of information of child molesters & sex offenders. We referenced the acquittal of child molesters & sex offenders to the public. However yes, releasing their names & pictures to the public is a public service as well.

          1. Public service?? How so? They were more or less forced to be jurors and were chosen by BOTH sides. The prosecution in fact loved them since 5 of the 6 were mothers.

            They listened to the testimony and saw all the evidence. They were sequestered and deliberated without outside influences. They found him NOT GUILTY in spite of the state and Judge Nelson doing everything in their power to get a conviction, any conviction. This case was a travesty of justice from the very beginning for Zimmerman.

            Their names most likely will eventually be public record, as the Casey Anthony jurors were. Why in the world would you try to obtain their names and photos and put them and their families in danger? For website hits? Pathetic. Just because you don’t like the verdict, doesn’t mean it was wrong.

            What IS wrong is the political, racial and media manipulation of this case and the evidence.

          2. Its one thing to published unsensored news which i think its great to get as many facts out, but another thing to put families of jurors in danger just because you think the trial didn’t go your way. These families are in real danger and if something ever happens to them, you are just as responsible as the people that would harm them. All in the name of getting publicity. Can’t you just be satisfied by publishing and gathering all the facts about the case…Like Trayvon was a mixed martial arts 17 year old young man and trainee hooked on Codine Lean. The pictures of Zimmermans bashed bloodied head. ETC ETC…

      2. Releasing the names and photos of the 6 innocent jurors is a far cry from a lawyer releasing the names and images of child molesters and killers. If you haven’t a pulse or a moral compass to speak of, explaining to you why it is a bad idea will fall upon your deaf ears. Al Sharpton, Ben Crump and the Racist Thugs tweeting thousands of Death Threats for George will be thankful and indebted to you. Why not switch careers and become a molester yourself after this, it would be a step up the ladder from placing 6 Jurors and their families in harms way, coward.

    2. You are talking about All White Women, in a Very Racist and Republican state. One juror insists she was bullied into making a decision she knew was wrong. Their sequester was very unusual. Actually it was illegal.
      At the very least there was a mistrial. The judge knew that and didn’t question it. An honest judge would have called for another group from the jury pool. (I speak of Florida because I lived there for many years, from north to south. Everyplace outside of Broward and Dade counties are grossly bigoted. The county in question is near southern Georgia.)
      It is quite clear they let a man off for murder. No one has denied that charge. They need to explain why they let him off for murder.

    1. Keeps getting put in queue… Working on the 6 jurors of George Zimmerman story…. Probably by tomorrow night it should be posted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *